Sunday, 20 November 2011

Auto accident attorney LA- Comparative Negligence

Car accident settlements are very complicated in nature, and tend to be more troublesome for the everyday driver as the automobile accident laws are different between states. The difference in laws has a huge impact on the accident case and the compensation you receive from an at-fault insurance company. Fault is always a highly contested issue in car accident cases, and you will need an experienced auto accident attorney in Los Angeles to investigate and calculate the settlement amount.

When the personal injury is found to have been caused in part by the victim, it can become a case of comparative negligence. Comparative negligence is a law that divides car accident damages based on whether the victim is partially responsible for some of their own injuries. One common reason that can make a car accident victim a part of comparative negligence case is when the victim is not wearing a seatbelt. In such a case, even if a at-fault driver crossed a red light and collided with the victim in an intersection, a victim has to share the injuries caused if he/she was not wearing a seat belt. The insurance company will stress that some of the injuries could have been avoided, so they will argue for comparative negligence.

An expert auto accident attorney in Los Angeles will help to represent your case in a powerful way. There are four different systems that come under comparative negligence, pure comparative negligence, pure modified comparative negligence, modified comparative negligence with a 50% bar rule, and modified comparative negligence with a 51% bar rule.

Understanding the automobile accident law can be a bit challenging. If you’ve been injured in a car accident, you must contact an auto accident attorney in Los Angeles immediately to get legal help.

No comments:

Post a Comment